Tigers List Archive
Perfect Tubing Flare
Posted by mailbot
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jan 28, 2001 06:21 PM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: James Barrett <(email redacted)>
Folks,
Just tried my new #345 RIDGID double flare
tool. Used the same old used brake lines that I
had been completely unsuccessful flaring with the
"Performance Tool". The RIDGID tool did NOT allow
the tubing to slip and its construction alignes the
tool properly with the tubing. The double flare
appears to be as good as any factory produced flare.
The clamped area of the tube was also smooth when I was
done. Finally a tool that works!
I was hoping that the first stage of the
double flare would be OK to use as a bubble flare,
however, I do not think so now. I will buy the
tubing (locally) with the bubble flare and
convert one end, or both as needed, to the double flare.
I did try a single flare with the brake line.
The line split at it's seam, so the double flare is
necessary for this type of 3/16" brake line.
The RIDGID tool was list priced at $47.75 with tax.
James Barrett Tiger II 351C and others
Mail From: James Barrett <(email redacted)>
Folks,
Just tried my new #345 RIDGID double flare
tool. Used the same old used brake lines that I
had been completely unsuccessful flaring with the
"Performance Tool". The RIDGID tool did NOT allow
the tubing to slip and its construction alignes the
tool properly with the tubing. The double flare
appears to be as good as any factory produced flare.
The clamped area of the tube was also smooth when I was
done. Finally a tool that works!
I was hoping that the first stage of the
double flare would be OK to use as a bubble flare,
however, I do not think so now. I will buy the
tubing (locally) with the bubble flare and
convert one end, or both as needed, to the double flare.
I did try a single flare with the brake line.
The line split at it's seam, so the double flare is
necessary for this type of 3/16" brake line.
The RIDGID tool was list priced at $47.75 with tax.
James Barrett Tiger II 351C and others
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jan 30, 2001 01:28 PM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted)
The new issue of Street Rodder has a review of a revolutionary, new
flaring tool that looks high quality AND expensive, tho no price is
listed---a phone number was.
Al J.
James Barrett wrote:
> Folks,
> Just tried my new #345 RIDGID double flare
> tool. Used the same old used brake lines that I
> had been completely unsuccessful flaring with the
> "Performance Tool". The RIDGID tool did NOT allow
> the tubing to slip and its construction alignes the
> tool properly with the tubing. The double flare
> appears to be as good as any factory produced flare.
> The clamped area of the tube was also smooth when I was
> done. Finally a tool that works!
>
> I was hoping that the first stage of the
> double flare would be OK to use as a bubble flare,
> however, I do not think so now. I will buy the
> tubing (locally) with the bubble flare and
> convert one end, or both as needed, to the double flare.
>
> I did try a single flare with the brake line.
> The line split at it's seam, so the double flare is
> necessary for this type of 3/16" brake line.
>
> The RIDGID tool was list priced at $47.75 with tax.
> James Barrett Tiger II 351C and others
Mail From: (email redacted)
The new issue of Street Rodder has a review of a revolutionary, new
flaring tool that looks high quality AND expensive, tho no price is
listed---a phone number was.
Al J.
James Barrett wrote:
> Folks,
> Just tried my new #345 RIDGID double flare
> tool. Used the same old used brake lines that I
> had been completely unsuccessful flaring with the
> "Performance Tool". The RIDGID tool did NOT allow
> the tubing to slip and its construction alignes the
> tool properly with the tubing. The double flare
> appears to be as good as any factory produced flare.
> The clamped area of the tube was also smooth when I was
> done. Finally a tool that works!
>
> I was hoping that the first stage of the
> double flare would be OK to use as a bubble flare,
> however, I do not think so now. I will buy the
> tubing (locally) with the bubble flare and
> convert one end, or both as needed, to the double flare.
>
> I did try a single flare with the brake line.
> The line split at it's seam, so the double flare is
> necessary for this type of 3/16" brake line.
>
> The RIDGID tool was list priced at $47.75 with tax.
> James Barrett Tiger II 351C and others
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.








