Tigers List Archive
Item # 1834092464
Posted by mailbot
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jun 4, 2002 09:58 PM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Paul Heuer" <(email redacted)>
> Check out the Alpine on E-Bay: Item # 1834092464. A Tiger killer with a
350
> done right.
Check out where the engine is sitting! It's a long way further forward than
in a Tiger. Wouldn't this make for some interesting handling? I thought that
was the problem with the Ken Miles prototype Tiger.
Looks nice from outside though. Inside is a bit too 'drag racer' for me
though.
Cheers,
Paul.
Mail From: "Paul Heuer" <(email redacted)>
> Check out the Alpine on E-Bay: Item # 1834092464. A Tiger killer with a
350
> done right.
Check out where the engine is sitting! It's a long way further forward than
in a Tiger. Wouldn't this make for some interesting handling? I thought that
was the problem with the Ken Miles prototype Tiger.
Looks nice from outside though. Inside is a bit too 'drag racer' for me
though.
Cheers,
Paul.
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jun 5, 2002 12:05 AM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted)
Hi all:
Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering
right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly,
he did.
Meanwhile, there's a beautiful TVR Vixen for sale--and me with no garage
space and no extra money. Drat!
Regards
David Sosna
Paul Heuer wrote:
>
> > Check out the Alpine on E-Bay: Item # 1834092464. A Tiger killer with a
> 350
> > done right.
>
> Check out where the engine is sitting! It's a long way further forward than
> in a Tiger. Wouldn't this make for some interesting handling? I thought that
> was the problem with the Ken Miles prototype Tiger.
>
> Looks nice from outside though. Inside is a bit too 'drag racer' for me
> though.
> Cheers,
> Paul.
Mail From: (email redacted)
Hi all:
Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering
right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly,
he did.
Meanwhile, there's a beautiful TVR Vixen for sale--and me with no garage
space and no extra money. Drat!
Regards
David Sosna
Paul Heuer wrote:
>
> > Check out the Alpine on E-Bay: Item # 1834092464. A Tiger killer with a
> 350
> > done right.
>
> Check out where the engine is sitting! It's a long way further forward than
> in a Tiger. Wouldn't this make for some interesting handling? I thought that
> was the problem with the Ken Miles prototype Tiger.
>
> Looks nice from outside though. Inside is a bit too 'drag racer' for me
> though.
> Cheers,
> Paul.
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jun 6, 2002 12:33 AM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <(email redacted)>
----- Original Message -----
From: <(email redacted)>
To: "Paul Heuer" <(email redacted)>
Cc: <(email redacted)>; <(email redacted)>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: Item # 1834092464
> Hi all:
> Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering
> right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly,
> he did.
>
Chebby motors have the sump in the rear of the oil pan.
He is probably running the rack directly under the front (high) part of the
oil pan.
Erich
Mail From: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <(email redacted)>
----- Original Message -----
From: <(email redacted)>
To: "Paul Heuer" <(email redacted)>
Cc: <(email redacted)>; <(email redacted)>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: Item # 1834092464
> Hi all:
> Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering
> right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly,
> he did.
>
Chebby motors have the sump in the rear of the oil pan.
He is probably running the rack directly under the front (high) part of the
oil pan.
Erich
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jun 6, 2002 10:14 AM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted)
Oh, now THAT'S slick! Guess there's some compensation for having the
distributor at the rear of the motor!
Regards
David
Kathy and Erich Coiner wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <(email redacted)>
> To: "Paul Heuer" <(email redacted)>
> Cc: <(email redacted)>; <(email redacted)>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Item # 1834092464
>
> > Hi all:
> > Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering
> > right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly,
> > he did.
> >
>
> Chebby motors have the sump in the rear of the oil pan.
> He is probably running the rack directly under the front (high) part of the
> oil pan.
>
> Erich
Mail From: (email redacted)
Oh, now THAT'S slick! Guess there's some compensation for having the
distributor at the rear of the motor!
Regards
David
Kathy and Erich Coiner wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <(email redacted)>
> To: "Paul Heuer" <(email redacted)>
> Cc: <(email redacted)>; <(email redacted)>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Item # 1834092464
>
> > Hi all:
> > Actually, he also claims to have "done the rack and pinion steering
> > right". With the engine as far forward as that, I wonder what, exactly,
> > he did.
> >
>
> Chebby motors have the sump in the rear of the oil pan.
> He is probably running the rack directly under the front (high) part of the
> oil pan.
>
> Erich
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Jun 6, 2002 07:29 PM
Joined 15 years ago
68,271 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "lewis gooch" <(email redacted)>
I sent an email to the builder: "I was wondering if you could give me
some more info about what you mean when you say "Front is Mustang rack and
pinion done right". I am sure other Tiger owners would be interested also.
Thanks for any info you can give.
Here is the answer:
Hi Lewis, Thanks for your interest in the Sunbeam. It is my first build of a
European car. All my other cars are 30s American cars and 60s muscle cars.
As to your question about the front end. I'm not sure the Ford motor will be
as much of an issue as the Chevrolet was for me.(when it comes too the front
end) I had to notch the oil pan around the front cross member (2"
so I
could get the motor low enough too clear the hood. This set up a tylemetry
problem with the mustang control arms.(they trailed the spindle perches 4"
and had a upwards lift that was about 3".This created a incredible
bind.After hours of measuring and three trips too the wrecking yard I found
that the spindles off a Chevette had a perfect drop loop (the actual spindle
I could'nt use,but it's trailing arm was perfect) I welded that trailing arm
to the original spindle and it worked perfect. The alignment toe in & toe
out were dead on and there was full stop to stop on the suspension with
nothing lost and no binding. If you like or think it would help when I get
it back I could email pictures of the set up.
Mail From: "lewis gooch" <(email redacted)>
I sent an email to the builder: "I was wondering if you could give me
some more info about what you mean when you say "Front is Mustang rack and
pinion done right". I am sure other Tiger owners would be interested also.
Thanks for any info you can give.
Here is the answer:
Hi Lewis, Thanks for your interest in the Sunbeam. It is my first build of a
European car. All my other cars are 30s American cars and 60s muscle cars.
As to your question about the front end. I'm not sure the Ford motor will be
as much of an issue as the Chevrolet was for me.(when it comes too the front
end) I had to notch the oil pan around the front cross member (2"
so Icould get the motor low enough too clear the hood. This set up a tylemetry
problem with the mustang control arms.(they trailed the spindle perches 4"
and had a upwards lift that was about 3".This created a incredible
bind.After hours of measuring and three trips too the wrecking yard I found
that the spindles off a Chevette had a perfect drop loop (the actual spindle
I could'nt use,but it's trailing arm was perfect) I welded that trailing arm
to the original spindle and it worked perfect. The alignment toe in & toe
out were dead on and there was full stop to stop on the suspension with
nothing lost and no binding. If you like or think it would help when I get
it back I could email pictures of the set up.
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.








